While I agree with your observations around how to navigate AI in the workplace and how different leadership styles are approaching it. I’m a little less effervescent when it comes to the urgency.
We only need to look back through history to recall the fear and panic surrounding things like the Ford Model T, the wireless’o’gram, the television or mobile, the Internet and cloud computing. These all arrived with the message of urgency and fear of ‘must act now’.
We know AI is big. But absolutely no one, absolutely no one knows quite where or how it will end up. Which I think is to your point about continuous open learning with AI.
Thanks for the comment, Paul – glad you enjoyed it.
Less effervescent is a very sensible place to be on this. I don’t feel fizzy, though – just focused on action.
The intention here was to make a plain call for urgent action, even if that action is learning, adaptation and asking the big questions about where this will end up and what its consequences will be in the very near term.
Panic’s not something I’d ever advise, or want to incite. Fear, however – that’s not something to shoo away. Take it and turn it into resolve and fuel for action, that’s my view
Great read. Love the Ethan Mollock quote about leadership usage. So, so on point.
Thanks, Paul. So, so important to get leaders hands on.
This is one of those things that needs leasing from the top > down. Freedom to play, experiment, and fail is critical.
Great read Antony. 💥
While I agree with your observations around how to navigate AI in the workplace and how different leadership styles are approaching it. I’m a little less effervescent when it comes to the urgency.
We only need to look back through history to recall the fear and panic surrounding things like the Ford Model T, the wireless’o’gram, the television or mobile, the Internet and cloud computing. These all arrived with the message of urgency and fear of ‘must act now’.
We know AI is big. But absolutely no one, absolutely no one knows quite where or how it will end up. Which I think is to your point about continuous open learning with AI.
Pragmatic engagement. Not panic.
Thanks for the comment, Paul – glad you enjoyed it.
Less effervescent is a very sensible place to be on this. I don’t feel fizzy, though – just focused on action.
The intention here was to make a plain call for urgent action, even if that action is learning, adaptation and asking the big questions about where this will end up and what its consequences will be in the very near term.
Panic’s not something I’d ever advise, or want to incite. Fear, however – that’s not something to shoo away. Take it and turn it into resolve and fuel for action, that’s my view